Friday, December 07, 2007

An excellent piece

You can't say it any better than this. Media Maven Marcy Burstiner's column in this week's Journal - Pray for the Reporter

In my favorite movie, Three Days of the Condor, the assassin Joubert advises Robert Redford’s character, Joe Turner, to leave the United States. Turner says “I’d miss it if I were gone.”

Turner knows that people within the U.S. government hired Joubert to kill him, but he still doesn’t want to leave. He’d miss it. That’s how I feel about the Eureka Reporter.

For those who like to bash the Reporter, consider Humboldt County without it. When a newspaper goes from publishing seven days a week to five, that’s a sign of hard financial times. There are others. Its reporters are disappearing and more articles in the paper now carry no byline than stories that do carry a byline. (Generally that means that what you think is an article is just a printed press release.)

To many people, that’s reason to celebrate. A local boycott of the Reporter is a running joke — you can’t boycott something that’s free. Advertisers can, however, although I tend to think that the failure of the local business community to support the free paper has more to do with the problems of measuring the readership of a free paper than it has to do with dislike of its political slant.

I’d rather have a conservative paper than no paper. I’d rather have a paper owned by a conservative zillionaire than no paper. Consider that Dean Singleton owns the other paper. He lives in Colorado even as he owns just about every local paper in California.

There’s a rich history in the media business of newspapers founded on the egos of crazy rich men. In my short journalism history I worked for four crazy zillionaires — Charlie Munger, Bruce Wasserstein, Jim Cramer and Sy Newhouse. All four operated good publications. I avoided working for Singleton, not because of politics but because of his disregard for quality, his focus on newspapers as product and his tendency to pay reporters little, work them hard and bust their unions.

These days, with newspaper circulation falling across the board, you’d have to be crazy to get into the newspaper business. Consider the Bancrofts and the Wall Street Journal — a whole family of crazy rich people getting out of the newspaper business.

The Eureka Reporter recently attempted to survey its readers. Unfortunately, it was a case study in how not to do a media survey. First, it distributed the survey only in the Sunday newspaper, so it eliminated people who didn’t pick it up that day. You had to return the survey by hand delivery or mail.

In a note to readers Sunday about changes at the newspaper, publisher Judi Pollace said this: “The most fun a publisher can have is reading comments about how much you love us, and there were hundreds.” That’s backwards thinking. To grow newspaper readership you have to reach disgruntled readers and find out what they want and aren’t getting. Readers rarely love good newspapers. They read them, utilize them and act on what they read. Journalism is a masochistic profession. We’re the messengers people often want to kill. We strive to tell a truth people often don’t want to hear. Journalists understand that if too many people love what we’re doing, we probably aren’t doing the job right.

The survey’s multiple choice questions focused on what people did or did not read in the paper, rather than why they did or did not read it. For example, it asked you to check off whether you regularly, occasionally or never read the Humor Column by Nathan Rushton. But I didn’t know that Rushton’s column was supposed to be a humor column, so the question confused me. And it didn’t ask me whether I would regularly read his column if it were actually funny.

But don’t write off the paper yet. It eliminated paper publishing on Mondays and Tuesdays, but it recently added a fourth member to its editorial board: Peter Hannaford, a key adviser to Governor Ronald Reagan and a former partner to former Reagan adviser and lobbyist extraordinaire Micheal Deaver.

It makes for some interesting dynamics on the paper. The way editorials used to work involved a majority vote from the members of the three-person team. That led, at least once, to managing editor Glenn Franco Simmons writing a separate column opposing the paper’s stand. If they still use the voice vote, I’d like to see how they get out of a split.

I like having the Eureka Reporter around. It gives jobs to my current and former students. And it prints any opinion out there. For those who see it as a bullhorn for Arkley, they ignore how it prints columns by Amy Goodman, Dave Berman and others. It gives a forum for the 911 Truth folks — those pushing to reopen the investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Centers — who can’t get their voices into the North Coast Journal or Times-Standard. My stand isn’t whether I support the opinions or not. What I support is the forum for expression.

Until Heather Muller’s byline disappeared, it was the only paper that consistently covered our courthouse and kept an eye on what cases our district attorney prosecuted or pleaded out.

It also serves as a check on how the other paper treats its reporters. It is hard to tell your editor to screw himself when the other publications pay writers $25 a story or 10 cents a word. Feed your kids on that.

While you can’t boycott a free paper, there’s an effective way of opposing it. Support the other paper. Arkley subsidizes the Eureka Reporter. When someone will rather pay for the competition than get his paper free, that’s a quantifiable protest. Arkley loses money with every issue printed. You don’t like what the paper says? Write it a letter or column. He’s paying for the ink and newsprint and the energy and labor it costs to run his beautiful press. I’m betting the Reporter will print it. They’ll print just about anything.


Odd. "Heraldo" hates it. Something about EarthFirster Greg King not getting his way...

Look. Competition is good for the entire marketplace. The people at the Eureka Reporter have made it against all odds to this point. No, it's not the same kind of struggle that the Eye, The McKinleyville Press and The Journal have had, but taking a "paper" from an online only to a daily is an incredibly difficult endeavor, even when it is well-funded. Except for the money, the teamwork and camaraderie, the trials and tribulations are something to be admired and respected. Like 'em or dislike 'em, all of the reporters here work under impossible conditions, with little compensation, and they deserve our thanks.

And to take off from Burstiner's last point - if you VALUE the diversity of opinion, the quality of the publications, support them. Imagine if the Journal folded. Or the Eye. It would be a tremendous loss for the community. If you own a business, buy ads. That's how they survive, and, surprisingly, your own business will grow and prosper as well. If you value the Eureka Reporter, do more than pray, buy some ads. Pay for a subscription. Even if it is free.

23 comments:

  1. I didn't realize Heather Muller was gone. That's really too bad!

    I also didn't know that the ER wants to kill Marcy Burstiner!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The loss of Heather Muller is a huge blow. That's the kind of reporter who wins your paper awards. You can't afford to lose them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this blog only around to offer the compete opposite viewpoint of The Humboldt Herald?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Fred. Yeah, 5:43, it may be. And we've got some doozies I need to deal with.

    This portrayal of TPZ owners as dupes, for one. The false portrayal of their situation as "preferential," the Cobb/Lovelace Disinformation Hour on KHSU last night - just to name a few.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have to say I enjoyed this exchange on Heraldo's poisoning post:

    Kevin Hoover Says:
    December 7, 2007 at 4:15 pm
    “Anonymous Says:
    December 7, 2007 at 3:22 pm
    Yes kevpod, no one is truly anonymous online. Period. That’s what I mean.”

    Who is “I?” Heraldo? A new shadow figure?

    What is there to hide from - something real or imaginary demons?

    My opinion: it’s easier to take cheap shots - like the stuff Heraldo trades in day in and day out - when you’re hiding behind a ski mask.


    Heraldo should step forward. He/she/it/they will actually find it liberating. It is hard to keep a secret like that one. What is it "heraldo" is afraid of?

    ReplyDelete
  6. No way Rose. Heraldo has all kinds of shit to sling but he is a coward.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How very un-PC and sexist of you 7:21. Could not her-aldo be a femashitterslinger?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey, I think Nathan Ruston is funny. The Maven has it all wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The "Nate-ster" is as adorable and the "Hank-ster" and funny too.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Heather Muller was biased and Nathan Rushton is BORING!! The Times-Standard's reporter covering the Cheri Moore case is doing a great job, though!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting that anyone who catches Gallegos lying is "biased." Look at all the hits on Kevin Hoover for not endorsing Gallegos. Toe the line or else...?

    I do agree that the Times Standard is doing a good job on the Cheri Moore story as it unfolds.

    ReplyDelete
  12. robin shelley12/13/2007 7:02 PM

    By all means, keep a good thought for the future of The Eureka Reporter. An independently-owned local newspaper is a rare thing & any community that has one - no matter its slant - is a fortunate community, indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  13. He/she/it is kicking your ass, Rose, in case you haven't noticed. Maybe the message is more important than the name. Your poor-mouthed attacks on Heraldo reveal just how frustrated you are. Must stink to be you!

    ReplyDelete
  14. ? Your focus is badly skewed, Di-- Jane, so tell us all, what is "heraldo" afraid of?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I never made that claim. What do you think, Rose? You seem to have cornered the market on paranoia. Got a shallow opinion about who he/she/it is? Or are you pedaling fear?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rose, you wallow in your own ignorance and you fear enemies with out names and faces. Are you bi-polar?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm everything you hate, and I am your worst nightmare.

    ReplyDelete
  18. One must toot their own horn, Rose.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Surely you have something better to do.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It's a way to pass the time. A minor dalliance. A fleeting amusement. They say that nightmares span mere moments of time. As my worse nightmare, Rose, you seem rather... indifferent.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Indifferent is a good word. Irrelevant is, too.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are open. Play nice.