In reading all the information about the potential candidates for DA, I have noticed that John Chiv is not as objective as a he claims he is. I have noticed he gives more information on some of the candidates while leaving out key information on others. If you are going to report, then report objectively or don't report at all.
John's pretty open about having an opinion. It's not hidden. You can have an opinion and still be fair, I think. Rather the opposite of the supposedly unbiased reporters we're used to.
It is surely better for a person who gathers and disseminates information to disclose his or her opinions, rather than pretend to be objective. I have never read a post by Mr. Chiv in which he claimed to be "neutral"; rather he frankly and frequently expresses approval. If anything, he seems to have difficulty saying what he does not like, he seems to like everyone, though not, perhaps, to the same degree.
Rose thanks for your comment. As for the 2 comments attacking me, if you have the guts sign your name. I dont have to explain or defend myself and I will make this comment about those anonymous comments attacking me or Rose or anyone else providing information and comments. Anons attack when confronted with the truth and because they disagree politically or have an agenda to divert public from the truth. Also there have been comments made about both women candidates again anon. Some of those made to me by other candidates or their supporters. If I wanted I could have exposed them. Personal attacks come from people who have niether have ethics or can deal with the truth.
Anon, assuming you are different than the anons who commented on 12/14 and 12/15, I can count and write. This thread is not about me, so stick to the topic.
You proved the points I made above very nicely. Thanks.
In reading all the information about the potential candidates for DA, I have noticed that John Chiv is not as objective as a he claims he is. I have noticed he gives more information on some of the candidates while leaving out key information on others. If you are going to report, then report objectively or don't report at all.
ReplyDeleteJohn's pretty open about having an opinion. It's not hidden. You can have an opinion and still be fair, I think. Rather the opposite of the supposedly unbiased reporters we're used to.
ReplyDeleteMaggie Fleming ?! Wow, that is great news !
ReplyDeleteIt is surely better for a person who gathers and disseminates information to disclose his or her opinions, rather than pretend to be objective. I have never read a post by Mr. Chiv in which he claimed to be "neutral"; rather he frankly and frequently expresses approval. If anything, he seems to have difficulty saying what he does not like, he seems to like everyone, though not, perhaps, to the same degree.
ReplyDeleteMs. Fleming- honest, diligent, intrepid, experienced, proven, courageous, indomitable, kind, humble--
ReplyDeleteso, this being Humboldt, she's doomed.
Rose thanks for your comment. As for the 2 comments attacking me, if you have the guts sign your name. I dont have to explain or defend myself and I will make this comment about those anonymous comments attacking me or Rose or anyone else providing information and comments. Anons attack when confronted with the truth and because they disagree politically or have an agenda to divert public from the truth. Also there have been comments made about both women candidates again anon. Some of those made to me by other candidates or their supporters. If I wanted I could have exposed them. Personal attacks come from people who have niether have ethics or can deal with the truth.
ReplyDeleteI saw only one comment critical of Mr. Chiv. He sees two. Interesting.
ReplyDeleteAnon, assuming you are different than the anons who commented on 12/14 and 12/15, I can count and write. This thread is not about me, so stick to the topic.
ReplyDeleteYou proved the points I made above very nicely. Thanks.
Or you proved mine.
ReplyDeleteYou should stay out of the business if 1) you are so thin skinned, and 2) think you get to control the thread.