◼ http://co.humboldt.ca.us/election/content/content.asp?pg=election_results.htm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Vote For 1
KATHLEEN BRYSON 795 5.98% 507 3.40% 1,302 4.61%
ALLISON JACKSON 5,157 38.76% 5,291 35.48% 10,448 37.03%
PAUL V. GALLEGOS 4,787 35.98% 6,420 43.05% 11,207 39.72%
PAUL HAGEN 2,556 19.21% 2,673 17.92% 5,229 18.53%
Unresolved Write-Ins 0 0.00% 7 0.05% 7 0.02%
Unqualified Write-Ins 10 0.08% 15 0.10% 25 0.09%
Cast Votes: 13,305 95.73% 14,913 96.32% 28,218 96.04%
These numbers cannot be correct, there is no way Allison Finished second to Gallegos the Turd!
ReplyDeleteAllison's supposed "poor performance" is really attributable to Gallegos' nasty campaign smears, including a whisper campaign at local churches attempting to discredit her. Also, that bitch Kathleen Bryson had no business being in this campaign from the get go.
ReplyDeleteThe language used by the posters here only show what sort of people follow Rose and this hate-filled blog...
ReplyDeletejust sayin'
Gags has a 61 percent disapproval rate. That means he is unelectable. Bryson and Hagen are to be thanked.
ReplyDeleteGallegos is not in the clear. More campaigning to go, more time for him to screw up or for people to learn about prior screw ups.
ReplyDeleteThankfully Jackson has a very good shot at beating Gallegos in November. I hope Hagen will suck it up and throw his support to Allison.
The DA's office is in serious need of a change.
Anyone who puts themselves out there - offers themselves up to serve the community - deserves to be thanked.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Paul Hagen ran a very positive campaign, and is a brilliant community leader. I hope we haven't heard the last of him.
ReplyDeleteEric. Jackson also ran a positive campaign.
ReplyDeleteWell..., it wasn't as negative as Dikeman's. But I have problems with that ad, even setting aside Heraldo's erroneous initial posting.
ReplyDeleteA lot of us have problems with Paul, Eric.
ReplyDeleteBut what if...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.times-standard.com/ci_15267054?source=most_viewed