Showing posts with label EPD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPD. Show all posts

Thursday, June 04, 2015

Body cams for cops, who next? You?

While they are a good idea - they're just as likely to prevent or expose false reports/exonerate as they are to uncover police misdeeds - you're treading into 1984 territory. Oh, no, you're crazy, there's no slippery slope.... No? That's what they said about cigarette bans leading to sugar and salt bans. How about drug testing? Once reserved for people in public safety positions, like pilots and bus drivers, now you have to get a drug test to work at the local hardware store.

So how far are you willing to go? Ready to be recorded, and monitored, every second of your life?

More questions at the EPD Police Blog....

◼ Police Body Worn Camera’s…Are Teachers, Preachers and Health Care Workers Next?
If BWC’s are so successful, why not legislate them for teachers, preachers and health care workers also? All are professionals with incredible public trust, high rates of lawsuits and their activities have resulted in injury or death. The police, Eureka Police, are up for the task and are moving forward. Who else will?

Sunday, March 02, 2014

Shiloh Chase, one of the many repeat offenders or when you should have bail bonds and an attorney on retainer


Press release from EPD:

On 03-01-2014 at about 8:01 am, officers of the Eureka Police Department located a suspicious vehicle at the 1300 block of H Street in Eureka. A records check of the vehicle revealed that it had been reported stolen to the Arcata Police Department on 2-9-2014.

Officers contacted the solo occupant/driver of the vehicle, identified as Shiloh John Chase (36 years old of Eureka). Chase was soon taken into custody for possession of stolen property. A search of his person recovered suspected methamphetamine.

Chase was transported to the Humboldt County Correctional Facility and booked on charges of possession of stolen property, possession of a controlled substance, and probation violation. He is being held on $25,000 bail.

◼ EPD Cleans Up Two Arcata-Related Situations - Mad River Union
__________________

◼ ...Chase was transported to the Humboldt County Correctional Facility and booked on charges of possession of stolen property, possession of a controlled substance, and probation violation. He is being held on $25,000 bail. Just a week ago, he had three cases on court calendar...

I picked Shiloh Chase because he has been in trouble in 2010 and before and is one of those names that I remember. There are others. I see them back again time and time on the court calendar. Could have researched more cases and more evidence of drugs being involved. However, he isn't the only repeat revolving door offender. We have many that law enforcement and probation and the court are familiar with that just keep coming back.

While I do think that realignment has affected crime and consequences, Humboldt County had an issue before that. These repeat offenders know every way to scam the system, they beg and plead this time they have learned their lesson, now they will seek therapy, and they will never, again commit a crime.

And attorneys file papers, the alleged criminal doesn't like the result, he/she hires another attorney. The system is set up for these scammers. I could go research the many cases Shiloh Chase and others I recognize have had in the court system for even just the past 5 years.

I am all for consitutional rights and due process but how many times do you have to be arrested and not just for alleged non-violent crimes or petty theft and with drugs? Again, the above questions are not all for situations involving Chase.

How many times do you have to get away scott- free and have the money to hire a private attorney each time before it's enough and you actually have to pay for your crimes?

(This is an excerpt. read the whole thing at the link)

◼ Frequent flier Shiloh Chase gets another slap on the wrist - John Chiv/Words Worth

Four cases for Shiloh Chase were up for Disposition and Rest this afternoon in Judge Feeney's court. Luke Brownfield for the People and Public Defender Heidi Holmquist for Chase.... A few fines, a little jail time. People did not ask for restitution today, reserved for future.... Shiloh looked cool and relaxed before his case was called, after all he knew there are never any real consequences.

Saturday, March 01, 2014

PHOTO UPDATED: The wanted individuals depicted on this list are presently being sought by EPD for theft related offenses.


We are reaching out to the community for their help in locating these suspects. Anyone encountering the listed subjects should not attempt to contact or apprehend them, but rather call the ◼ Eureka Police Department immediately at (707) 441-4044 or (707) 441-4060.

◼ Only 3 suspects left from Eureka's Most Wanted Poster Number 1 - John Chiv/Words Worth

Good work. NOW, let's hope the DA's Office does their part.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Former Eureka police officer mulling plea deal; terms of DA's office not disclosed in felony case

◼ Former Eureka police officer mulling plea deal; terms of DA's office not disclosed in felony case - TS

A former Eureka police officer facing drug and theft charges is considering accepting a plea agreement, the details of which have not been made public.

Appearing in Humboldt County Superior Court Thursday, Daniel “Danny” Kalis asked that future court dates in his case be pushed back a couple of weeks so he and his attorney will have time to review a plea offer from the District Attorney's Office.

”I anticipate we do have a resolution, I just request a bit more time to review the offer,” Kalis' attorney Marek Reavis told the court. Reavis and Deputy District Attorney Nicole Bockleman were not immediately available to comment for this story Thursday.

Friday, July 01, 2011

Council approves Nielsen firing

◼ Council approves Nielsen firing - TS
The Eureka City Council voted 4-1 today, with Councilwoman Linda Atkins dissenting, to approve the firing of former Police Chief Garr Nielsen....

At the conclusion of the closed session, interim city attorney Andy Stunich also reported that the council voted unanimously to affirm the appointment of EPD Capt. Murl Harpham as interim police chief.
◼ EKA City Council Affirms Nielsen Firing - LCO
(you'll get a "Buzzfeed Buzzbox (Invisible Tracker)/About: blank" from that link, looks like)

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

EPD Chief Garr Nielsen said Monday that he only learned of the DA's investigation last week and expressed disappointment that he wasn't notified of a criminal investigation targeting one of his officers.

◼ Kalis arrested: Former Eureka Police Department officer booked, released Monday
Former Eureka police Officer Daniel “Danny” Kalis was brought into custody Monday, some six months after a misdemeanor warrant was issued for his arrest.

Kalis -- who was charged last week with drug possession, theft and other charges -- was named in the September 2010 warrant after failing to appear at a court hearing in which he was to be arraigned on four misdemeanor Department of Fish and Game violations.

Humboldt County District Attorney Chief Investigator Mike Hislop said he called Kalis on Monday and he agreed to turn himself in.

”We met him down at the Bayshore Mall and he surrendered there,” Hislop said. “He was completely cooperative.”

Hislop said Kalis was booked into jail on Monday and was released after promising to appear May 16 for an arraignment on both the old and new charges.

Kalis was placed on administrative leave by the EPD on March 7, the same day the department launched an internal affairs investigation into allegations surrounding his conduct. He resigned from the force on April 1.

The DA's Office announced last week that it was charging Kalis with nine criminal counts -- including heroin and marijuana possession, petty theft, false imprisonment, vandalism and accessing DMV records without authorization -- on the heels of an investigation it launched in January.

EPD Chief Garr Nielsen said Monday that he only learned of the DA's investigation last week and expressed disappointment that he wasn't notified of a criminal investigation targeting one of his officers.


What?

EPD Chief Garr Nielsen said Monday that he only learned of the DA's investigation last week and expressed disappointment that he wasn't notified of a criminal investigation targeting one of his officers.

”I think that, as the head of an organization, I should be notified when one of my personnel is under investigation unless that investigation directly involves me,” Nielsen said. “First of all, I think it's common courtesy. But it would also ensure that I don't have someone out there that is potentially a threat to the public that I'm not aware of, or somebody who is potentially compromising confidential information that I'm not aware of.”

Hislop said Nielsen had contacted him and expressed his views.

The investigator said it was a difficult decision not to inform Nielsen -- a decision ultimately made by District Attorney Paul Gallegos.

”We really mulled it over for a long time,” Hislop said....


◼ Accused officer on the job with warrant out; officer faced misdemeanor charges in 2010; ex-wife files for restraining order
◼ Kalis arrested: Former Eureka Police Department officer booked, released Monday
◼ Former EPD officer arrested on outstanding warrant, released
◼ Accused officer on the job with warrant out; officer faced misdemeanor charges in 2010; ex-wife files for restraining order

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Criminal Charges Filed Against Eureka Police Officer Daniel “Danny” Kalis - Possession of a Controlled Substance (Heroin)

◼ Accused officer on the job with warrant out; officer faced misdemeanor charges in 2010; ex-wife files for restraining order

DA Press Release:
To: humboldtherald@gmail.com, indie@asis.com, mskymkemp@gmail.com, politol@sou.edu, ryanburns@northcoastjournal.com, asherman@times-standard.com, Arcata Eye news@arcataeye.com, cynthia \(k-Mud cynthia@kmud.org, dtam dtam@times-standard.com, Duncan, Jeannie JDuncan@co.humboldt.ca.us, Ferndale Enterprise editor@ferndaleenterprise.us, Hislop, Michael MHislop@co.humboldt.ca.us, Humboldt Beacon news@humboldt.com, Jessie Faulkner editor@tricityweekly.com, John Ford john@kbae955.com, Keat, Wesley WKeat@co.humboldt.ca.us, Keith Easthouse keitheasthouse@hotmail.com, KHSU mjcrawdad@yahoo.com, KHUM mike@khum.com, KIEM - TV kiem-tv@humboldt1.com, KIEM Channel 3 kiemnews@hotmail.com, "KINS" kinsnews@yahoo.com, news@kmud.org, thejack@humboldt.edu, "Matt Drange" mdrange@times-standard.com, matthewwmendes@hotmail.com, "McCulley, Vicki" VMcCulley@co.humboldt.ca.us, melissa.hutsell@gmail.com, "Moser, Joyce" JMoser@co.humboldt.ca.us, "Mullen, Lynette" LMullen@co.humboldt.ca.us, "northcoast journal - newsroom" newsroom@northcoastjournal.com, "Pinto, Tom TPinto@co.humboldt.ca.us, Shoshani, Michele MShoshani@co.humboldt.ca.us, Steve Wolf - Rio Dell Times steve@riodelltimes.com, terri \(K-MUD\) terri@kmud.org, Thad Greenson tgreenson@times-standard.com, "Times-Standard - Editor" editor@times-standard.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: April 14, 2011
Contact: District Attorney Paul Gallegos
Phone: (707) 268-2571, (707) 267-4400

Criminal Charges Filed Against Eureka Police Officer

In January 2011, the Humboldt County District Attorney’s Office (HCDA) Investigations Bureau began receiving reports of alleged criminal conduct on the part of Eureka Police Department (EPD) Officer Daniel “Danny” Kalis. Between January and March 2011, HCDA investigators began gathering information to either substantiate or disprove the claims of misconduct.

In March, Officer Kalis became the subject of a formal Internal Affairs Investigation initiated by the Eureka Police Department and Kalis was placed on Administrative Leave on March 7, 2011. The Internal Affairs Investigation uncovered evidence of potential criminal conduct and the Eureka Police Department sought assistance from the HCDA Investigations Bureau. On March 16, 2011, representatives of the Eureka Police Department and the Humboldt County District Attorney's Office met to discuss the status of their individual investigations to that point. It was then decided to initiate a joint EPD/HCDA investigation to examine Officer Kalis’ potential criminal conduct while he was a member of the Eureka Police Department.

As a result of that extensive investigation, the Humboldt County District Attorney's Office has filed the following criminal charges against Officer Daniel Kalis:
H&S11350(a) Possession of a Controlled Substance (Heroin)
PC4570 Unauthorized Communication with a Prisoner
H&S11357(c) Possession of more than 1 ounce of Marijuana
PC236 False Imprisonment
B&P4060 Possession of Controlled Substances without a Prescription
CVC1808.45 Unauthorized Disclosure of DMV Records
PC502(c)(7) Unauthorized Access to Computer Network
PC488 Petty Theft
PC594 Vandalism

The matters are scheduled for arraignment in Humboldt County Superior Court on May 16, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The investigation continues and additional criminal charges may be filed.

Relating to this investigation, District Attorney Paul Gallegos stated, “State and local law enforcement’s first obligation is to enforce California laws and I know it is a sad day for all law enforcement when we must prosecute an officer that has failed to do that.  Hopefully Humboldt County citizens will see this joint investigative effort as evidence that their law enforcement agencies

are committed to providing the highest caliber of law enforcement and putting the community’s interests above all others.”

HCDA Chief Investigator Mike Hislop added, “Although it is unfortunate when law enforcement is forced to investigate one of their own, this investigation demonstrates our common position that abuse of authority by police officers will not be tolerated. I commend the Eureka Police Department for seeking assistance with this sensitive matter and commend the EPD/HCDA investigative team for quickly and efficiently completing the complex investigation.”

According to Eureka Police Chief Nielsen, effective April 1, 2011, Officer Kalis is no longer employed with the Eureka Police Department. “Such allegations, if proven, cast a pall upon a noble profession which derives its legitimacy from the public trust,” Nielsen said. “The violation of that trust impacts the profession, our organization and the dedicated men and women who place themselves in harms way to ensure the safety of our communities.” Nielsen stressed that complaints or allegations received by his office are taken seriously and investigated objectively and thoroughly. “We are an organization which holds the public trust above all else and will not permit anyone to violate that which so many work so diligently to earn and maintain,” he added.

Members of the community with information regarding potential criminal actions conducted by Officer Kalis are urged to contact Eureka Police Department Senior Detective Todd Wilcox at (707) 441-4315 or HCDA Investigator Wayne Cox at (707) 268-2591.

◼ Kalis arrested: Former Eureka Police Department officer booked, released Monday
Former Eureka police Officer Daniel “Danny” Kalis was brought into custody Monday, some six months after a misdemeanor warrant was issued for his arrest.

Kalis -- who was charged last week with drug possession, theft and other charges -- was named in the September 2010 warrant after failing to appear at a court hearing in which he was to be arraigned on four misdemeanor Department of Fish and Game violations.

Humboldt County District Attorney Chief Investigator Mike Hislop said he called Kalis on Monday and he agreed to turn himself in.

”We met him down at the Bayshore Mall and he surrendered there,” Hislop said. “He was completely cooperative.”

Hislop said Kalis was booked into jail on Monday and was released after promising to appear May 16 for an arraignment on both the old and new charges.

Kalis was placed on administrative leave by the EPD on March 7, the same day the department launched an internal affairs investigation into allegations surrounding his conduct. He resigned from the force on April 1.

The DA's Office announced last week that it was charging Kalis with nine criminal counts -- including heroin and marijuana possession, petty theft, false imprisonment, vandalism and accessing DMV records without authorization -- on the heels of an investigation it launched in January.

EPD Chief Garr Nielsen said Monday that he only learned of the DA's investigation last week and expressed disappointment that he wasn't notified of a criminal investigation targeting one of his officers.

”I think that, as the head of an organization, I should be notified when one of my personnel is under investigation unless that investigation directly involves me,” Nielsen said. “First of all, I think it's common courtesy. But it would also ensure that I don't have someone out there that is potentially a threat to the public that I'm not aware of, or somebody who is potentially compromising confidential information that I'm not aware of.”

Hislop said Nielsen had contacted him and expressed his views.

The investigator said it was a difficult decision not to inform Nielsen -- a decision ultimately made by District Attorney Paul Gallegos.

”We really mulled it over for a long time,” Hislop said....

◼ Former EPD officer arrested on outstanding warrant, released
◼ Accused officer on the job with warrant out; officer faced misdemeanor charges in 2010; ex-wife files for restraining order

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

'nuther shoe

◼ Another EPD employee files suit against city
Former Eureka Police Department public information officer Suzanne Owsley filed a lawsuit against the city last week, alleging employment discrimination, harassment, wrongful demotion and the intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The suit -- which seeks unspecified damages in excess of $25,000 and was filed in Humboldt County Superior Court on Nov. 19 -- names the city of Eureka, EPD, Chief Garr Nielsen and EPD Records Manager Erin McBride as defendants, and is the second lawsuit filed in as many weeks against the city by current and former EPD employees.
Owsley, who spent 17 years working for the department before leaving in November 2008, alleges in the suit that Nielsen and McBride carried out a campaign of harassment against her that spanned months and included demoting her, doctoring her performance evaluation, barring her from setting foot on EPD property without a police escort and assigning her demeaning duties, including cleaning a women's locker room.
As a result of the alleged harassment, Owsley suffered a loss of employment, humiliation, mental anguish, emotional and physical distress and has been injured mentally and emotionally, according to the suit. At least some of the allegations contained in the suit were previously investigated by the city of Eureka, which found no evidence of wrongdoing, according to the suit....

In the suit, Owsley alleges that an errant text message, sent by Nielsen and received by her, and a complaint filed by her with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission spawned the months of harassment. Owsley alleges in the suit that she received a text message from Nielsen on Dec. 14, 2007 -- the day after the city's Christmas party -- reading: “Sorry I was not much fun last night.” Owsley alleges that when she asked Nielsen about the message after receiving it, he denied having sent the message.
Owsley alleges later in the suit that she learned that EPD Communications Supervisor Tawnie Hansen was the intended recipient of Nielsen's text message, and that city employees believed Hansen was having an “inappropriate relationship” with Nielsen. Hansen filed suit against the city Nov. 10 alleging that she was being harassed due to this belief -- which she insists to be false -- and that the city failed to adequately investigate the alleged harassment she was suffering and bring it to a halt....

◼ Another lawsuit hits City of Eureka "heraldo"(a)

Separate but related:
◼ Down and Dirty
◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges
◼ City of Eureka: Claims will be thrown out
◼ MASSIVE LAWSUIT TARGETS EUREKA, CITY MANAGER Fri, Nov 13th, 2009 4:07
◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges Nov. 13, 4:38 p.m.
◼ TS EPD employee files civil suit against city 11/14/2009 1:30 AM
◼ ABOVE THE LAW (Most all posts have been removed)
◼ Turmoil at EPD Sat, Apr 5th, 2008 12:53 pm
◼ Police anger at chief surfaces
◼ Garr Nielsen named new EPD Chief Thu, Mar 15th, 2007 9:55 pm
◼ KSLG to interview disgruntled cop blogger Fri, Apr 18th, 2008 11:57 pm
◼ Nielsen cleared Sat, May 10th, 2008 9:11 am
◼ TS Complaint against chief found to be unsubstantiated
◼ Nasty cops prompt ER (Eureka Reporter) crack down Thu, June 5th, 2008 8:15 am
◼ Eureka Police blog spawns lawsuit Mon, June 29th, 2009 5:00 am
◼ INNOCENT: Grand Jury concludes police chief investigation Thu, July 2nd, 2009 5:59 pm
◼ Police Chief critic quits EPD Sunday, July 5th, 2009 at 12:01 am
◼ Police blog lawsuit settled Fri, Aug 7th, 2009 12:30 am
◼ GRAND JURY REPORT
◼ JN Broken Blue Line July 2, 2009
◼ MASSIVE LAWSUIT TARGETS EUREKA, CITY MANAGER Fri, Nov 13th, 2009 4:07
◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges Nov. 13, 4:38 p.m.
◼ TS EPD employee files civil suit against city 11/14/2009 01:30:14 AM PST
◼ ‘Global investigation’ expensive Mon, Nov 16th, 2009 5:00 am
◼ City of Eureka: Claims will be thrown out 11/18/2009

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Really? Only Two Possibilities?

Everyone is fucking everyone else or thinking about everybody fucking everybody else? Those are the only two possibilities here?

◼ Down and Dirty
...It seems to me that these two cases merely present the informed public with a range of questions that, though unanswerable, help us to understand how city government works. Is everyone in Eureka City Hall doing it up, down and sideways 24 hours a day, in every conceivable combination, as if it were the last days of the Roman Empire? Or does everyone just imagine that everyone except them is getting loads of action, resulting in a funky yellow stew of rage inside Fifth and K? Or are both things true, to one degree or another?

One of the above scenarios must be the case....


Better shut down City Hall then.

There are a number of other possibilities here, CHIEF among them is someone is looking for a nice chunk of go-away change.

◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Ugliness in Eureka - and more go-away money?

An ongoing saga, or an amped up salvo in the Marina Center war... another case that could be a novel. You've seen how the positioning happens, the first stirrings show up on the Humboldt Herald blog, then the allegations cut loose in the comments, next it shows up in another form, and gets picked up in the papers. And by then the damage is done.

A year or so ago, discontent at EPD blew up into the Blogsphere with the advent of a blog called "Above The law." It seemed to be a case of playing the Herald game, using the blog to anonymous air complaints, allegations and, perhaps, facts. Whichever it was, the message was clear, people weren't happy with the new police chief, Garr Neilsen.

That blog ended up being taken down, the reasons unknown, either it had served its purpose or the threat of litigation had an effect. It was talked about on the blogs, but not too extensively.

For those who weren't following it, the details are to be found at the links in this post, but the short version is that there were allegations that Neilsen was having an affair with Tawnie Hansen, and that she received favorable treatment as a result. Both she and Neilsen deny it, and she ended up filing a lawsuit against Former Eureka Police dispatcher/EPD Support Services Manager Devora “DeeDee” Wilson, a woman she perceived to be in on the blog - that resulted in a settlement and the whole thing appeared to be over.

More recently, in apparently unrelated events, the Marina Center project has made some progress, coming to the forefront, and the Humboldt Herald heralded the beginnings of the takedown of City Manager Dave Tyson.

Lo and Behold. Ms. Hansen springs forth with another lawsuit, targeting Dave Tyson
(Added: The Complaint is date stamped November 10, 2009.)
It breaks on the Herald,
◼ MASSIVE LAWSUIT TARGETS EUREKA, CITY MANAGER Friday, November 13th, 2009 at 4:07
The Journal blogs it,
◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges Nov. 13, 4:38 p.m. noting that:
The suit is saucy in the extreme. Key passage here:…
(b) Tyson had a personal friendship and aligned himself with Wilson, a member of the anti-Chief Nielsen group who Tyson was aware had publicly criticized Chief Nielsen at a City Council meeting and who he also knew was an adversary to Hansen;

(c) at the same time, Tyson, who spoke openly to Hansen of his potential sexual encounter with an elected Eureka official, had previously flirted with Hansen in public — including touching her in a suggestive manner — and intimated to her that he would be desirous of her performing a specific sexual act with him;

(d) Hansen rejected Tyson’s sexually aggressive overtures and never did or said anything to convey to Tyson that she was open to them;

(e) Tyson, having been rebuffed by Hansen in this regard, was both angry with Hansen and jealous of Chief Nielsen when he learned of the above-described defamatory statements regarding Hansen’s purported affair with Chief Nielsen, which statements Tyson apparently believe were true; and

(f) given these misplaced beliefs and his alignment with Wilson, Tyson had no desire to take any steps to have the defamatory publications stop or to bring to end the harrassing conduct to which Hansen was being subjected.

◼ TS EPD employee files civil suit against city 11/14/2009 1:30 AM

Wow. Is he (Hansen's Attorney, Alan Goldberg) writing a steamy novel? Or is this a lawsuit? Are these allegations or facts? It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out. The timing dovetailing with Heraldo’s blog release has already raised questions (see comments on "his" site as well as the Times Standard site), and the obvious positioning against Tyson that has been going on there… looks like more scorched-earth politics and settling a political vendetta…

Two things jump out at me... one is she (Hansen) is alleging that broadening the scope of investigation was a delaying tactic, when it would seem to be acting responsibly to conduct a thorough investigation in an obviously complicated and delicate matter. Broadening the investigation certainly doesn’t amount to disrespecting her complaint or attempting to sweep it under the rug.

And two… whether he wanted to or not, he could not do much, if anything, about a blog that may or may not have been posted by a city employee on their own time - that is a matter of free speech and not something he can just command to stop in any circumstances.

Union rules and employer/employee laws would also apply in almost all aspects, not a simple thing in any way shape or form.

Something doesn’t smell right. Jus’ sayin’. If you read below, the names involved....

As of last week, it is far from over. It's the talk of the town, no one I have heard speaks well of Ms. Hansen as they speculate as to the truth of the allegations and affairs. And regardless of the truth of the allegations, because that's what they are at this point, many people will be hurt by this. Already have been, if the comments threads at the Times Standard and Humboldt Herald blog are any indication. The comments at the latter already meet or surpass those that were on the Above The Law Blog, just a different target.

Background:
◼ ABOVE THE LAW (Most all posts have been removed)
◼ Turmoil at EPD Saturday, April 5th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
◼ Police anger at chief surfaces
◼ Garr Nielsen named new EPD Chief Thursday, March 15th, 2007 at 9:55 pm
◼ KSLG to interview disgruntled cop blogger Friday, April 18th, 2008 at 11:57 pm
◼ Nielsen cleared Saturday, May 10th, 2008 at 9:11 am
◼ TS Complaint against chief found to be unsubstantiated
◼ Nasty cops prompt ER (Eureka Reporter) crack down Thursday, June 5th, 2008 at 8:15 am
◼ Eureka Police blog spawns lawsuit Monday, June 29th, 2009 at 5:00 am
◼ INNOCENT: Grand Jury concludes police chief investigation Thursday, July 2nd, 2009 at 5:59 pm
◼ Police Chief critic quits EPD Sunday, July 5th, 2009 at 12:01 am
◼ Police blog lawsuit settled Friday, August 7th, 2009 at 12:30 am
◼ GRAND JURY REPORT
◼ JN Broken Blue Line July 2, 2009
◼ link
◼ MASSIVE LAWSUIT TARGETS EUREKA, CITY MANAGER Friday, November 13th, 2009 at 4:07
The Journal picks it up, ◼ Tyson, City Sued on Harassment Charges Nov. 13, 4:38 p.m.
◼ TS EPD employee files civil suit against city 11/14/2009 01:30:14 AM PST
◼ ‘Global investigation’ expensive Monday, November 16th, 2009 at 5:00 am
◼ City of Eureka: Claims will be thrown out 11/18/2009
A lawyer representing the city of Eureka issued a statement Tuesday saying the city is confident the more than $1 million harassment lawsuit brought against it by a police department employee will be thrown out of court.

EPD Communications Supervisor Tawnie Hansen -- a 14-year employee of the department -- filed the suit Nov. 10, alleging that the city, and specifically City Manager David Tyson, vindictively and unreasonably delayed an investigation into complaints that Hansen was being harassed by other department employees.

In the statement, Adrienne Moran, of the Santa Rosa law firm Shapiro, Galvin, Shapiro and Moran, said she will be defending the city.

”The city has thoroughly investigated Ms. Hansen's claims and could not substantiate them,” Moran said in the statement, adding that the city is confident the “claims against Mr. Tyson and the city will be thrown out.”

Last week, Tyson denied all the allegations in Hansen's suit....

Hansen's attorney, Alan Goldberg, told the Times-Standard last week that this is not the first time Hansen has made these claims, saying she told at least one council member and the city attorney of the alleged incident between her and Tyson shortly after it happened.

Reached Tuesday, former Eureka City Councilman Chris Kerrigan said he and sitting Councilman Larry Glass met with Hansen at some point in or around the summer of 2008, while Kerrigan was still in office.

”She did talk with and meet with both Larry and I, and her concerns were not only about the city manager but about her situation with the police force,” Kerrigan said, declining to discuss the details of Hansen's concerns. “My recollection was that it encompassed both: her concerns with the city manager and her concerns with her own workplace environment. I do recall that the city attorney was notified, and if it wasn't (Hansen) it was myself who, as the next step, talked to the city attorney.”

Glass confirmed Tuesday that he attended the meeting with Hansen and Kerrigan, but declined to go into any details.

”Tawnie did indeed meet with me and Chris,” Glass said. “She had a number of concerns that she brought to us. That's all I can say at this point.”

City Attorney Sheryl Schaffner declined to comment for this story, saying that Moran is handling all media inquires about the case....

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

New blog in town

The new blog in town deals with EPD issues from an unusual perspective. It will be interesting to see how it evolves. Comments are moderated. Some are saying they are heavily moderated. I recommend you open it up and allow real discussion to occur. But welcome to the blogsphere, http://abovethelaweureka.blogspot.com/

Related:
TS Council to review chief's contract 4/4/08
TS Closer look at chief's new contract 4/5/08
Police anger at chief surfaces 4/5/08
In a special meeting called to review Eureka Police Chief Garr Nielsen's contract Friday, the city council largely heard two very different stories -- one from members of the public and another from police department employees.
After a more than hour-long public comment period that saw nearly three dozen people come to the podium, the council voted unanimously -- with Councilwoman Polly Endert absent -- to approve Nielsen's revised contract, with each member individually voicing support for the chief.

TS After complaints about the chief, EPD looks to working together in the future 4/9/08
TS Turning anger into a positive vision 4/13/08

Just to clarify, this one is about Eureka's Chief, not Blue Lake's. For those from outside the area, it can get confusing. They're starting to wonder if there's any sanity up here. The answer is yes, but politics here is a blood sport.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Gallegos: No criminal conduct in Cotton death

Gallegos: No criminal conduct in Cotton death
Humboldt County District Attorney Paul Gallegos held a press conference Thursday to announce his investigation into the August 2007 death of Martin Frederick Cotton II is complete, and no criminal charges will be filed.

“There is no evidence — or certainly not evidence of a compelling nature that a crime was committed,” Gallegos said.

Though numerous witnesses were interviewed, due to the lack of evidence, “we simply could not bring a case to trial that would win,” Gallegos said, adding that unlawful use of force by the Eureka Police Department could not be proven...
,,,Upon arrival to the jail, he was too combative for a medical evaluation — a process that normally occurs prior to being booked into the facility, Nielsen said.

He was placed in a “sobering” cell which has an approximately one-quarter-inch thick rubber coating on the floor and on short wall that surrounds the toilet and sink. The cement walls are not coated.

Gallegos said that on a video from a motion-sensor camera that monitors the cell, Cotton was seen striking his head and body parts on the cell.

“He is very combative with himself, or what he may perceive as another person,” Gallegos said. “The padding would not necessarily prevent the sort of injuries that Mr. Cotton had.”

The video also showed correctional officers checking on him periodically, and reacting promptly when he was unresponsive.

The cause of the fatal injury to Cotton’s head — an acute subdural hematoma due to blunt force trauma — could not be pinpointed, Gallegos said.


NCJ Who Killed Martin Cotton?
Blogthing - Martin Cotton Redux
TS No charges coming in Cotton's death
Cotton's estate has filed a wrongful death and civil rights violation claim against the City of Eureka, the County of Humboldt, the Eureka Police Department and the Humboldt County Sheriff's Office as well as unidentified corrections officers.,,,

...Cotton's aunt, Lynda Rumburg, said she wasn't surprised by Gallegos' decision.
”I think he is a coward,” Rumburg said. “I think (Eureka Police Chief Garr) Nielsen is a coward. I think the sheriff is a coward. And, most of all, the officers that first responded, then the officers that were in jail and did nothing other than watch my nephew die a horrible, awful death are cowards.”


In this case, Madam, Gallegos has done the right thing, and the EPD officers who risk their lives going into a situation like this deserve thanks.

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

EPD SWAT team ordered to stand down

URGENT ALERT! This case was TOSSED by the Judge - never made it to trial.
☛ ER http://eurekareporter.com/article/080826-judge-throws-out-douglas-zanotti-case
Feeney said the indictments the grand jury handed down to Douglas and Zanotti in December 2007 weren’t supported by probable cause. Insufficient evidence regarding the former leaders’ alleged failure to oversee other law enforcement was also presented to the grand jury, Feeney said, and instructions given on “exigent circumstances” were inadequate.
The grand jury should have also been instructed on justifiable homicide by law enforcement officials, Feeney said.

***
Original post: EPD SWAT team ordered to stand down

Citing a lack of resources and personnel, Eureka Police Department Chief Garr Nielsen issued an order Tuesday effectively disbanding his department’s Strategic Weapons and Tactics team.

“SWAT has been an issue and a concern for me since I got here,” Nielsen said in an interview Wednesday, noting that at the time of his hiring in May the team had only eight members and had recently dwindled to six.

“That takes us to the point that I do not feel comfortable saying we have a team that could handle a major incident in the city,” he said. “For instance, if I had an officer shot and needed to get him out of a situation, or a barricaded subject, I don’t know that I have the resources myself to be able to handle something like that right now.”

Additionally, Nielsen added, the six remaining SWAT team members “are under a great deal of strain right now” because of the criminal grand jury convened this week to determine whether charges should be filed in the 2006 EPD SWAT team shooting death of Cheri Moore.

“This is very emotional for them. This is very stressful for them. And quite frankly, I’m very concerned about a major incident happening now and having a SWAT situation they would have to take care of.”

Nielsen said repeatedly that he had “absolute confidence” in the team members’ competence and abilities.

“If I were somewhere and needed help, those are the first six people I would call.”...

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Smart man.

Looks like a fully justified major vote of no confidence in the DA.

Chief says future probes of epd will go to Department of Justice

Chief Garr Nielsen of the Eureka Police Department announced Monday that the California Department of Justice, rather than the local Critical Incident Response Team, would handle any future investigations involving EPD officers.

Nielsen said his department “would still be active partners in providing resources to any other agency at any time when requested for major criminal investigations, but any case involving use of force or criminal allegations against our officers will go directly to DOJ.”

The decision, Nielsen said, is intended to increase public confidence in the outcome of investigations.

“DOJ has a great deal of experience in investigating these kinds of incidents,” he said, “far more than anybody locally, and I believe they have a greater level of expertise.”

While Nielsen did not specifically link the decision to the CIRT investigation of the death of Martin Frederick Cotton II, who died Aug. 9 in police custody, the chief said he wished he had sent the Cotton case to the DOJ.

“Not because I think necessarily they would have done the investigation any differently or any better, but I think having people at the (Humboldt County) District Attorney’s Office closely linked to the department could compromise the appearance of objectivity,” Nielsen said.

Chief Investigator Mike Hislop from the District Attorney’s Office was involved in the Cotton investigation and previously worked as a traffic sergeant for the EPD.

Former EPD Traffic Officer Wayne Cox also now works for the District Attorney’s Office as one of Hislop’s investigators.

When asked if it made him uncomfortable to have his officers investigated by their former co-workers, Nielsen said, “Yes. To some degree it does. It’s not to say they inherently have a bias, but I think it’s very difficult to take personalities out of it when you’ve moved on to another organization.”

Nielsen acknowledged that Hislop and Cox were not the only local players to switch teams, and said he believed the community would have more confidence in investigations conducted by the state.

“I think the DOJ will lend a sense of impartiality to these investigations that isn’t necessarily there with people who have associations with local law enforcement, either because they’re former employees or have close personal relationships within the agencies being investigated,” Nielsen said.

Written guidelines created by the Law Enforcement Chiefs’ Association of Humboldt, or LECAH, state that primary investigative responsibility for critical incidents lies with the “venue agency,” meaning the office or department within whose jurisdiction the incident occurs.

While the LECAH guidelines “strongly encourage” use of CIRT protocols for investigations, they make clear the venue agency is under no obligation to do so.

“The DOJ has always been an available player,” Humboldt County Sheriff Gary Philp said Monday, “and certainly they can be brought into an investigation. It really falls to the agency of jurisdiction to decide.”

Though he called including DOJ resources “a good idea,” Philp said his office would likely continue using CIRT.

But Chief Randy Mendosa from the Arcata Police Department left open the possibility that the APD might also use the DOJ.

“The amount of resources and the level of expertise of the DOJ investigators is quite impressive. The DOJ option was not available to us when the individual department policies and the LECAH CIRT agreement were written,” Mendosa said.

“I have not yet talked with anyone at DOJ about this issue, but if they were willing and available, I would certainly amend our department policy to include the DOJ option.”

Nielsen said he made the announcement within the department Thursday and notified the heads of allied agencies Friday. The change took effect immediately.