Pages

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Looks like he showed up

ER District attorney frustrated about lack of authority over code enforcement officers
TS Gallegos bemoans lack of authority over code enforcement
Gallegos said he'd be willing to accept oversight of the program, and thereby take it away from the County Counsel's Office, if the Board of Supervisors requested it and if he were given the resources to meet the demand.

”I cannot afford to subsidize code enforcement by pulling people off of other law enforcement responsibilities,” he said.

Gallegos has temporarily suspended the deputization of code enforcement investigators while the task force looks into alleged excesses, including the unnecessary drawing of weapons.

Asked under what circumstances Gallegos would be comfortable deputizing those investigators again, Gallegos said that they would need to be his employees.


Should this man be permitted any more authority over any group given what he has done to the other entities (CAST, Victim Witness) under his control? He had to be forced to attend THIS meeting, for God's sake. Is there any evidence that he will exercise any oversight if given what he asks for?
Whether code enforcement officers even need the police powers given to them by the District Attorney’s Office was brought up during the meeting, as well. Those powers don’t exist for code enforcement officers in other rural counties in the state....

...According to a survey conducted by the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers, 46.5 percent of officers have police powers, 6 percent carry a weapon and 11 percent wear a bullet-proof vest...

...When the Del Norte County unit was first formed, the county decided that the officers shouldn’t be deputized, Mason said. That could change at some point, as there are still people who want officers to be armed, he said.

Madera County, a rural county of similar size to Humboldt County, doesn’t deputize its code enforcement officers either.

“It’s basically that the county decided at this point not to do it,” said Madera County Code Enforcement Officer Eric Yancy.

Also facing problems with junk and abandoned vehicles, the Madera County unit, which has a 90 percent compliance rate, has never issued a no-notice inspection warrant.

Code enforcement officers in Humboldt County, who use inspection warrants for only 8 percent of their cases, give no notice 65 percent of the time in those cases.

When backup is needed, the Madera County unit coordinates with the sheriff’s office. Yancy said the operation can be shut down at anytime...

8 comments:

  1. Don't be so hard on Gags. I'm sure he could manage the "meth" containers on your previous post. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  2. How can you compare Humboldt County to Madera County or even Del NOrte? Mendocino maybe!

    99% of this whole issue is really about growing marijuana. The contiued "extensions" of the code enforcement "ban" just helps out all the sohum dope growers! The fact that the "extentions" continue is evidence of corruption at the higher levels in county government.

    The dope growers are scared shitless that the code enforcment guys are going to show up and find their dope or provide information to "dope" cops. They go to the BOP and complain, threaten to vote them out, and so on. The BOP know what the real deal is, as does the DA, and the persons bitching the most.

    Does Del Norte County have a CLMP? How about Madera County? For that matter Butte County, Shasta County, Sacramento County, Alameda County, Orange County ...??? Golllie Gee. Could it be because of the marijuana growers?

    ReplyDelete
  3. AND it's front page news in both the local papers !!!!!!!!

    What does that tell you?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It does tell you alot!

    I'll say this, from what I have heard he did a decent job in that meeting, perhaps for the very first time realizing that he CAN work with others.

    After what? Almost 6 years in office.

    It almost makes you wonder what he might have been like if he hadn't fallen in with Salzman, Miller and Shellenberger.

    If he hadn't been convinced that he "couldn't trust anyone in that office except Tim (Stoen.)" If he hadn't been trying to hide some deep dark secret. If he'd been willing to listen to the others in the office who tried to give him advice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You notice a familiar name in the recent divorce list Rose?

    http://www.times-standard.com/ontherecord/ci_9765268

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. Trapero is getting a divorce?

    Sorry. Just kidding. Yeah. Too bad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Does Del Norte County have a CLMP? How about Madera County? For that matter Butte County, Shasta County, Sacramento County, Alameda County, Orange County ...??? Golllie Gee. Could it be because of the marijuana growers?"

    It's true.All of these counties have an organization similar to CLMP(I believe Del Norte is still CLMP territory).As most of these areas are surrounded by regions which produce more pot than Humboldt,which well,probably would include Del Norte.And there are hundreds of pot clubs in Orange and L.A. counties.How many total between Humboldt and Mendo?

    ReplyDelete
  8. mresquanie, there is something to be said for consistency.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are closed for the time-being.