Pages

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Three articles today

Three new articles on the Cheri Moore/possible Grand Jury indictments, including two excellent pieces from the Times Standard are posted below. I didn't edit or excerpt, so you'll have to do a bit of scrolling.

Other blog discussion:
Greg & Carol's Place
SoHum Parlance
...More from Eric... (I don't agree with Eric, post explaining why is in the works.)

12 comments:

  1. Thank you for your nice comment on Greg's post, Rose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're welcome. I appreciated the thoughtful nature of his post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Now Rose, remember to keep your conspiracies straight. You won't destroy Paul by appearing to be a mealy mouthed liar.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did you read Greg's post. 4:17?

    I've added a link to it in the post - or click here

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anon 4:17,

    Is your first name "AL"? Just wondering if we might be acquaintances.

    I've known a couple of Al Anons through the years, and they all came across as passive aggressive cowardly little weasels also.

    Your writing style shows you out. Attack, attack, attack. Name calling, Cursing....and all from behind an less than creative pseudonym.

    To a Lady, Mr. Weasel. A Lady who just Happens to Disagree with your political views.

    And, I encourage you to work on your Invective. Your slurs are mundane....and I "think" inaccurate tonight. I know.

    It's difficult sometimes with the pain in your heart to choose the words that properly express your bile.

    "Mealey Mouthed Lies". The term implies obfuscation. Rose, I think most Gentle Readers would agree is not disingenuous.

    Oh, and to reiterate, Al, you spineless, camel dung eating piece of human debris, She is a Lady.

    People can have different views. People have the Right and the Duty to express those views.

    Take a note of the other commenters that engage in Lively and Animated, sometimes agitated and aggressive, debate without calling a Lady names who volunteers her time and effort to give all of us a venue to discuss the issues.

    You bore me.

    Oh, just for fun, I'll turn your "compliment" back on you....

    Mehl im Maule behalten

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oops, I apologize, Al Anon, I forgot to sign off, and call you a

    Dick.
    Regards,
    Wollf

    ReplyDelete
  7. Way to go Wollf! Way to take the high road.

    By the way, judging from your drawn-out and incoherent post, you wouldn't happen to be a little slow, would you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're absolutely right, Al. I was wrong to take you to task as harshly as I did.

    You have every right to portray yourself as a cowardly, snippy puppy.

    I stand corrected.
    Wollf

    ReplyDelete
  9. Now look at who's being snippy ya old dogg you!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wollf, I'm disappointed in you. It's a perfectly acceptable debate technique to accuse someone of being a dupe for conspiracies and then insinuate that they're a mealy-mouthed liar. Just like we could respond to anon by claiming that he's a vacuous, ill-bred moron.

    Not that we would, you understand. It's that we could, if we wished.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I thought Wollf's new friend, "Al", might be one of those geeky, lonely, little, pimply-faced, teenage boys with a computer & bedroom full of outdated games & equipment from Christmases past but no car or girlfriend...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Heh - more likely an early baby boomer. Don't know about the car or the girlfriend. :)

    ReplyDelete

Comments are closed for the time-being.