tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post6419306616263673061..comments2023-12-23T03:49:20.907-08:00Comments on watchpaul: A NINE MONTH Delay In Sentencing, Then A Sudden MistrialRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14023852057418281003noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-56982115836382085392014-05-17T10:11:35.884-07:002014-05-17T10:11:35.884-07:00Rose, this is from the court minutes, Michael Lync...Rose, this is from the court minutes, Michael Lynch was questioned by the Judge; then Russ Clanton, then Paul, again Russ Clanton and Paul and then one final time by Russ Clanton.<br /><br />Both Paul and Russ Clanton address the Court. Motion for new trial granted. <br /><br />Paul is the one who requested the trial dates and within a time frame.John Chivhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14325700128778718091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-75982758027757348622014-05-16T20:18:39.592-07:002014-05-16T20:18:39.592-07:00Thank you, John.
John's latest post is an imp...Thank you, John.<br /><br />John's latest post is an important read: <a href="http://johnchiv.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-timothy-littlefield-story.html" rel="nofollow">The Timothy Littlefield story the mainstream media did not cover; another juror gives perspective</a>Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14023852057418281003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-91998201051059500752014-05-16T19:00:56.954-07:002014-05-16T19:00:56.954-07:00Rose, Thad Greenson followed up after my post befo...Rose, Thad Greenson followed up after my post before Will.<br /><br />And then today, in my post another juror offers another perspective.John Chivhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14325700128778718091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-40009627753045199852014-05-16T16:01:54.227-07:002014-05-16T16:01:54.227-07:00So let me get this straight. Clanton's office ...So let me get this straight. Clanton's office runs to Court with a declaration from this Juror, that said one thing. Then during actual testimony, the Juror said the opposite. (Shocking this happens everyday in Court.) Yet, the Judge decided to believe the written declaration and not the testimony in Court. A few questions. Who wrote that declaration? Who is working for Clanton? Was the juror bullied? There is seriously something wrong here, and I hope our media get to the bottom of this. I wish Gallegos luck on the appeal, but I wonder if these arguments were effectively made at the trial Court. Was opposition filed? The time to not lose this issue was in the trial Court, not hope for a better result on appeal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com