tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post206490158653531396..comments2023-12-23T03:49:20.907-08:00Comments on watchpaul: More cheerleading for PotRosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14023852057418281003noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-49002865317057253532009-03-21T08:04:00.000-07:002009-03-21T08:04:00.000-07:00People, you are living in an occupied territory. Y...People, you are living in an occupied territory. Your countryside isn't yours anymore; it's under the control of armed, drugged out pot growers. Try going for a walk in "our" hills and you'll meet them soon enough. Ever seen a real machine gun?<BR/><BR/>Not that Big Pot control the countryside, they are going after the towns. See the TS for evidence. <BR/><BR/>Your police are out gunned and outnumbered. Your military is busy elsewhere. You're on your own and you're going to be living in Columbia pretty soon. <BR/><BR/>Mr CPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-66208124807804587152009-03-20T08:09:00.000-07:002009-03-20T08:09:00.000-07:00I agree that changing the law and making pot legal...I agree that changing the law and making pot legal is a better idea than the gray area it's in now.<BR/><BR/>No laws should be diluted with doubt as to how to enforce them. Otherwise, we do open the doors to anarchy and anything goes.ImBlogCrazyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06114155503257613636noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25625654.post-59417726341749595502009-03-20T07:56:00.000-07:002009-03-20T07:56:00.000-07:00Well, the March 7 edition of that famously liberal...Well, the March 7 edition of that famously liberal item, the Economist is about the drug wars, and the editorial content inside makes some very good points about <BR/>legalization being the "least bad" alternative. I've only been in law enforcement 30 years, but<BR/>it makes sense to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com